|
The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) this week has 2 articles on avoiding antibiotics for childhood sinusitis.
One is a research article showing that there is no difference in the rate of symptom improvement unless the culture is positive for either Strep pneumonia or Hemophilus influenza, and only about 50% of the cases have one or the other of these. It also reveals that the color of the nasal discharge is no help in telling us whether there will be any response to antibiotics. The accompanying editorial goes further in saying that even when there is improvement, this improvement is not striking: it might be a slight decrease in the duration or the cough frequency, and in return, you get all the drawbacks of an antibiotic course. Read further for tips on avoiding antibiotics in several different situations. Tips for Avoiding Antibiotics By now, we’ve all heard that we need to try to avoid antibiotics. But did you know that at least 50% of all antibiotic prescriptions are unnecessary? This conjures up images of bored tired careless time-pressed doctors, but I think that is the wrong image. I think a lot of well-educated people who are otherwise getting good care are ending up on too many antibiotics because doctors don't have enough other tools. The illnesses for which antibiotics are often not needed range from a variety of upper respiratory infections (bronchitis, sinusitis, pharyngitis and otitis), to skin infections, and perhaps urinary tract infections. In functional medicine, we almost always focus on improving the gut microbiome. Thus, I am often disappointed when, in the middle of trying to improve their inflammation, my patients unnecessarily end up on antibiotics! The list of where antibiotics don’t help just keeps growing. We know of several conditions where antibiotics just set you up for the next infection by eliminating the beneficial bacteria that keep things in check. Here’s what I would do for some common conditions: 1. Sinusitis There is no evidence that antibiotics make a difference here. Whenever a study is done comparing different antibiotics and placebo, no difference is detected. Yet so many of my patients swear that they would get extremely sick if they didn’t have their antibiotics. So since sinusitis is a viral illness (unless you have a fever of 102.5); and since you can’t kill bacteria before they develop (resistant ones would develop in their place); here’s what I would like people to try before filling a prescription: an antiviral regimen. Purchase a bottle of Sambucol (NOT Sambucus) from Amazon ahead of time and keep it in your house in case you get a virus. At the first sign that you are coming down with a cold, take a dose of Sambucol and call me for a full antiviral protocol: it involves large doses of vitamin A, vitamin D, and other supplements. Let’s try to nip this in the bud and give you some strategies for the future. 2. Ear infections While these are very painful, about 99% of them resolve on their own, and that is also true in most children. I like to use ear drops with garlic and mullein, and if the infections are frequent, look for an underlying cause of allergies, such as food intolerance, or a history of water damage in the home. 3. Skin infections The first line of treatment for a break in the skin (a cut or abrasion) should be careful cleansing with soap and water, and very quick scrubbing of the area to remove dead skin. It is very hard for bacteria to infect live skin, but they go for those leftover bits if you are too gentle. Then elevate the area if appropriate, to prevent excessive swelling and give infection-fighting cells a chance to get to the wound. 4. Bronchitis This is also almost always viral. The exception is for chronically ill people, such as long-time smokers with chronic bronchitis, who can get their diseased lungs infected with bacteria. The rest of us just get cough with phlegm (that is the definition of bronchitis). It does not matter whether the phlegm is clear, creamy, yellow or green – it’s all viral (rust or blood requires investigation). Make sure you drink plenty of water to keep phlegm thin so you can cough it out more easily. If you get bronchitis often, let’s look for an underlying source of inflammation. I know from personal experience that improving your overall health can eliminate bronchitis from your life completely. But please avoid antibiotics. 5. Bladder Infections These are very common. They start with feeling like you need to urinate frequently, and a sensation of burning when urinating. Many women know to quickly get started on some cranberry concentrate, but don’t have any additional tools. When the cranberry fails, too many rush to their primary care provider, or even call and get a prescription over the phone. If you are at risk of urinary tract infections, please call me and let’s have a short visit. There are several treatments that would be appropriate for non-pregnant adults. So are they placebo? While the effect of unnecessary antibiotics could simply be placebo, it does seem like it could be something else when so many people swear by them. One theory I have is that antibiotics make people feel better by changing the mix of gut bacteria. Perhaps there are other ways of accomplishing this! Get some rest; change your diet; take probiotics? And in case you are wondering what else is overprescribed, here’s a list from the “Choosing Wisely” campaign, which attempts to improve the quality of care by physicians 7. Conjunctivitis: most pinkeye is also viral 8. Back pain: steroids do not work 9. Back pain again: MRIs rarely change management 10. Reflux in babies: antacids almost never work 11. Medications to bring down fever: almost never needed 12. Antibiotics for prevention of complications (for the dentist for example) when patients have mitral valve prolapse 13. Routine antacids to prevent ulcers in hospitalized patients I hope this helps you keep your personal collection of beneficial bacteria happy and thriving!
1 Comment
What might be a functional medicine approach to extending the "healthspan?"  Dr. Peter Attia, well-known to people interested in cutting edge science related to longevity, recently published his first book, Outlive, now a non-fiction New York Times best seller. The book is receiving mostly high praise on Amazon and Good Reads. At this point, most people know the basics of longevity:
Conventional medicine has long taught that there are actionable ways to avoid an early death. Public health has supported “health promotion and disease prevention,” and sets periodic goals for individual preventive services. The US Preventive Services Task Force publishes guidelines after reviewing the latest evidence. A service needs not only to be effective in reducing the harm from a certain disease, it also needs to not cause significant additional harm. Medicine 3.0 I admit I have not read Outlive, but I have been a faithful listener of 250 or more of Attia's podcasts, since the first one came out in 2018. I am very familiar with his outlook and recommendations. Attia introduces the concept of “Medicine 3.0.” The idea is that Medicine 1.0 is what happened when we found effective treatments for acute illnesses. Medicine 2.0, which is what most doctors are practicing, addresses chronic illness with certain medications. It also recommends certain diets (for example, the DASH diet for hypertension), and admits that sufficient exercise, stress reduction, and sleep are relevant to avoiding and managing chronic conditions. By Attia’s definition, Medicine 3.0 would build on its precursor by integrating advances in technology, data analytics, and systems biology to deliver truly personalized and precision medicine. Medicine 3.0 would leverage digital health technologies, artificial intelligence, and predictive analytics to optimize health outcomes and enable earlier detection and intervention. Under this banner, Attia also promotes the concept of “healthspan" extension, aiming to prolong healthy and functional life by targeting the underlying mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases. Interestingly I don’t think this type of medicine is available, many of the tests may be used in research settings but not in clinical settings, and only a few people can afford all the high tech tools, some of which have no proven net benefit. Accordingly, the most common critique of Outlive appears to be that it fails to give practical information.  Functional Medicine and the Healthspan Attia is not trained in functional medicine, and what he recommends overlaps with but does not encompass all of functional medicine. For example, I have never heard him or any of his podcast guests mention that an “elimination diet” meant to improve the quality and quantity of gut bacteria can powerfully impact cholesterol, including his favorite metric, the apolipoprotein B. But I have observed this repeatedly in my practice. It is almost a surprise when it doesn’t happen. To be fair, there does not appear to be research on this, but I learned it from my teachers in functional medicine. So as I scanned the several hundred reviews of Attia’s book, I wondered how the functional medicine approach to longevity and the health span would be different. The only study of longevity (actually using the Horvath clock as a proxy for longevity) showed that a specific diet (“Younger You”) resulted in the subjects becoming 3 years younger on average, after an 8-week diet change (Fitzgerald et al, 2021). Functional medicine has called itself “21st Century Medicine.” The emphasis on lifestyle, systems biology, and abundant lab work is present in both functional medicine and Medicine 3.0. However, functional medicine also emphasizes the following, and Attia fails to do so, in spite of the fact that there is reasonable evidence for their importance:
A practical proposal So I would like to propose Medicine 2.5/Functional Longevity: something that uses the science we have, and the tools that are presently available to us, to design a root-cause, personalized approach to longevity and healthspan:
 The Root-Cause Approach When it comes to the core parameters of longevity, functional medicine takes more of a root-cause approach than I ever hear discussed in Attia podcasts. Or sometimes, an approach that leverages the body’s pre-existing pathways to health. Here are some key parameters to optimize when aiming for a longer healthspan, and how one would address them using a root-cause approach. None of these work for everyone, and some should only be attempted after other steps have been taken. 1. Blood pressure: diet, exercise, elimination diet, stretching, nitric oxide supplements — and of course medication if all else fails. Treated hypertensives are never as healthy as normotensive people 2. High LDL or high apolipoprotein B: diet, exercise, fasting-mimicking diet, elimination diet, fiber, consider the impact of saturated fat, or the impact of carbohydrates 3. Homocysteine: B vitamins, elimination diet, omega 3 supplements 4. Glucose and insulin/insulin resistance diet, exercise, sleep, elimination diet, fasting-mimicking diet, stress reduction, improving HRV, increasing plant-based foods, ketogenic diet — it really depends on the person 5. VO2 Max: coenzyme Q10 and other mitochondrial nutrients, exercise 6. Bone health: calcium, vitamin D, exercise, diet, sleep, homocysteine, gluten-sensitivity, leaky gut and inflammation 7. Colon health: optimize gut bacteria, diet, exercise, elimination diet, probiotics, fermented foods, fiber (but in what order? That is dependent on the individual) 8. Muscle mass: exercise, diet (enough protein), reducing inflammation, sleep 9. Improving sleep: monitoring HRV, supplementation, making practical changes to sleeping environment and to preparation for sleep 10. Overweight: fasting-mimicking diet, 13-14 hour overnight fasting, elimination diet, exercise, toxins 11. CPR and other markers of inflammation: elimination diet, probiotics, sleep, stress reduction, exercise, cur cumin or anti-inflammatory herbs. MORE DETAILS ON OUR UNCONVENTIONAL LONGEVITY PROGRAM HERE.  REFERENCES https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33844651/ Fitzgerald KN, Hodges R, Hanes D, Stack E, Cheishvili D, Szyf M, Henkel J, Twedt MW, Giannopoulou D, Herdell J, Logan S, Bradley R. Potential reversal of epigenetic age using a diet and lifestyle intervention: a pilot randomized clinical trial. Aging (Albany NY). 2021 Apr 12;13(7):9419-9432. doi: 10.18632/aging.202913. Epub 2021 Apr 12. Erratum in: Aging (Albany NY). 2022 Jul 27;14(14):5959. PMID: 33844651; PMCID: PMC8064200. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29922669/ Fukui H. Increased Intestinal Permeability and Decreased Barrier Function: Does It Really Influence the Risk of Inflammation? Inflamm Intest Dis. 2016 Oct;1(3):135-145. doi: 10.1159/000447252. Epub 2016 Jul 20. PMID: 29922669; PMCID: PMC5988153. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37306302/ Lamas GA, Bhatnagar A, Jones MR, Mann KK, Nasir K, Tellez-Plaza M, Ujueta F, Navas-Acien A; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; and Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease. Contaminant Metals as Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jul 4;12(13):e029852. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.029852. Epub 2023 Jun 12. PMID: 37306302. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35310455/ Longo VD, Di Tano M, Mattson MP, Guidi N. Intermittent and periodic fasting, longevity and disease. Nat Aging. 2021 Jan;1(1):47-59. doi: 10.1038/s43587-020-00013-3. Epub 2021 Jan 14. PMID: 35310455; PMCID: PMC8932957. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33614892/ Lopatko Lindman K, Hemmingsson ES, Weidung B, Brännström J, Josefsson M, Olsson J, Elgh F, Nordström P, Lövheim H. Herpesvirus infections, antiviral treatment, and the risk of dementia-a registry-based cohort study in Sweden. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021 Feb 14;7(1):e12119. doi: 10.1002/trc2.12119. PMID: 33614892; PMCID: PMC7882534. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34256014/ Wastyk HC, Fragiadakis GK, Perelman D, Dahan D, Merrill BD, Yu FB, Topf M, Gonzalez CG, Van Treuren W, Han S, Robinson JL, Elias JE, Sonnenburg ED, Gardner CD, Sonnenburg JL. Gut-microbiota-targeted diets modulate human immune status. Cell. 2021 Aug 5;184(16):4137-4153.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.019. Epub 2021 Jul 12. PMID: 34256014; PMCID: PMC9020749. General Nutrients https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10138658/ Quan Z, Li H, Quan Z, Qing H. Appropriate Macronutrients or Mineral Elements Are Beneficial to Improve Depression and Reduce the Risk of Depression. Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Apr 12;24(8):7098. doi: 10.3390/ijms24087098. PMID: 37108261; PMCID: PMC10138658. Specific Nutrients Omega 3s https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36795219/ von Schacky C, Kuipers RS, Pijl H, Muskiet FAJ, Grobbee DE. Omega-3 fatty acids in heart disease-why accurately measured levels matter. Neth Heart J. 2023 Feb 16. doi: 10.1007/s12471-023-01759-2. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 36795219. Zinc https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32258830/ Qu X, Yang H, Yu Z, Jia B, Qiao H, Zheng Y, Dai K. Serum zinc levels and multiple health outcomes: Implications for zinc-based biomaterials. Bioact Mater. 2020 Mar 31;5(2):410-422. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.03.006. PMID: 32258830; PMCID: PMC7114479. DHEA https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32745490/ Wang F, He Y, O Santos H, Sathian B, C Price J, Diao J. The effects of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation on body composition and blood pressure: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Steroids. 2020 Nov;163:108710. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2020.108710. Epub 2020 Jul 31. PMID: 32745490. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33220453/ Hu Y, Wan P, An X, Jiang G. Impact of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) supplementation on testosterone concentrations and BMI in elderly women: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Complement Ther Med. 2021 Jan;56:102620. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102620. Epub 2020 Nov 18. PMID: 33220453. Copper https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21321490/ Prodan CI, Rabadi M, Vincent AS, Cowan LD. Copper supplementation improves functional activities of daily living in adults with copper deficiency. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2011 Mar;12(3):122-8. doi: 10.1097/CND.0b013e3181dc34c0. PMID: 21321490. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554529/ Klevay LM. The contemporaneous epidemic of chronic, copper deficiency. J Nutr Sci. 2022 Oct 11;11:e89. doi: 10.1017/jns.2022.83. PMID: 36304823; PMCID: PMC9554529. Pregnenolone https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4200497/ Brown ES, Park J, Marx CE, Hynan LS, Gardner C, Davila D, Nakamura A, Sunderajan P, Lo A, Holmes T. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pregnenolone for bipolar depression. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014 Nov;39(12):2867-73. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.138. Epub 2014 Jun 11. PMID: 24917198; PMCID: PMC4200497. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32119096/ Naylor JC, Kilts JD, Shampine LJ, Parke GJ, Wagner HR, Szabo ST, Smith KD, Allen TB, Telford-Marx EG, Dunn CE, Cuffe BT, O'Loughlin SH, Marx CE. Effect of Pregnenolone vs Placebo on Self-reported Chronic Low Back Pain Among US Military Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Mar 2;3(3):e200287. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0287. PMID: 32119096; PMCID: PMC7052727. Magnesium https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5637834/ Schwalfenberg GK, Genuis SJ. The Importance of Magnesium in Clinical Healthcare. Scientifica (Cairo). 2017;2017:4179326. doi: 10.1155/2017/4179326. Epub 2017 Sep 28. PMID: 29093983; PMCID: PMC5637834. Dr. Dale Bredesen published his End of Alzheimer’s book about a year ago in the summer of 2017. The group MPI Cognition began referring patients to providers trained in the Bredesen Protocol soon thereafter.
I have begun work with close to 30 patients for either prevention or reversal of cognitive decline. I have learned many things along the way, and have streamlined my approach, introduced practices to make it more comprehensive, as well as interventions to get to the root cause of the dysfunctions that lead to cognitive decline. There is so much to teach each patient that I have finally written a 70 page Handbook that provides much detail. It will soon be available on this website for $9.95. I will update the link when I upload it. Here are some lessons I have learned. THREE ASPECTS OF COGNITION I’m not talking here about underlying causes, but about what it looks like on computer testing. We use online computer cognitive testing to understand the pattern of people’s cognitive struggles. The program is called “CNS Vital Signs.” It is a only a 30-minute assessment and therefore cannot give us nuanced information. However, people seem to be declining in one aspect of cognition and sometimes not the others, as far as I have been able to see. It tends to be one of the following:
WHO IS AVERAGE? Many people who come to my office to optimize cognition were previously functioning at very high levels, typically in the “above average” range. Scores in the “average” and “below average” category for them represent cognitive decline. The good thing is that they are still in a position to partner with me to understand and be motivated to follow the program. They are not dependent on their spouse or adult child. If I’ve learned anything, it’s how much easier it is to do this work when the decline is still relatively mild. WHAT HAPPENS ON THE PROTOCOL The first few weeks after the initial visit, people are often overwhelmed and confused. The testing we use is complicated and unfamiliar. We have to be in contact so I can answer questions and we can move forward. Thus I have now added an hour to go over the report and recommendations from the first visit. At the results follow up visit, we go over test results and I show people what we will address first and how. Within a few more weeks, we see changes in energy and in any chronic medical conditions. Subsequent visits see us revisiting the basic medical issues, “deprescribing” (getting off) medications that stand in the way of health, and adopting protocol recommendations as new lifestyle habits. We also see new problems emerge and have to address those. Most people say they are thinking better within about 2-3 months. Memory has improved: how quickly people can access words that used to escape them, or the ability to multitask, engagement with other people, sleep, headaches sometimes, digestion almost always, anxiety level sometimes, and overall energy often. I have follow up data on only 4 patients at present. The improvements so far are very exciting and we’re not even done! I will tell each of their stories briefly in the next blog post. THE SPEED OF NERVE IMPULSES I worry that people with below average motor speed or reaction time will be at high risk of falls, injuries, or if they are driving, of auto accidents. One of the correlations so far has been the role of toxins. I often see high lead and mercury levels among patients seeing me for cognitive decline. I had not seen such high levels with patients who were not affected cognitively. Indeed there is research to show that lead (from the leaded paint and gasoline of the past, or from recent exposures such as working with stained glass, handling ammunition, and others) actually slows down impulse conduction speed from one end of the nerve cell to the other. Neurons talk to each other slower. Thus of course one perceives the world slower, processes inputs slower, and responds slower. When that gets much too slow, organization and memory are affected too. Literally people seem to be forgetting what they were about to do. There is evidence that carefully removing toxic metals leads to an improvement in this process. I have not yet had the chance to verify this for myself because it takes 9 months to a year to significantly reduce heavy metals. And before I even start the process, I have to make sure a patient is healthy enough for the testing itself (testing can involve the use of a medication that chelates heavy metals, that is it goes looking for them and pulls them out, and if it finds a large quantity, we can measure it in the urine). Treatment involves removing these metals a little at a time so they never overwhelm the body’s detoxification capacity, as they would redistribute and cause further harm. It is done through a combination of sweating (infrared sauna for example) and the use of supplements, herbal remedies, and medications. PRESENCE OF SEVERAL UNDERLYING CAUSES AT ONCE All my cognitive decline patients have several harmful processes going on at the same time. The groups defined by Dr. Bredesen are a good framework for me, but none of my patients have had only inflammation, or only high blood sugar, or only lead or mold. My sense is that by themselves, these may cause illness, but rarely cognitive decline. For example, I would see patients with leaky gut and fatigue or joint pain, or autoimmune disease, but mentally they were as sharp as ever. In my experience, cognitive patients have a pile-up of several impacts, and I believe they all contribute. Patients are typically inflamed: one patient has celiac disease, several had very high levels of antibodies to gluten. They typically also have excess glucose, some vitamin deficiencies, a few hormone deficiencies, and most likely either a heavy metal, mold exposure, reactivated Epstein-Barr virus, or exposure to Lyme disease. While it is conceivable that some of these impacts are not bothering them, I don’t see how I can leave any in place and just work on others. I believe that what I am seeing is that while there are many paths to becoming cognitively impaired, it isn’t actually noticeable until a critical mass of body functions are affected. I have seen patients come from other providers who were not thorough in addressing all the pieces above. I think that is unfortunate because the longer we wait, the harder it is to reverse the damage already done. Having seen the number of different things that are wrong with each person, my concern would be that I am doing too little, not too much, from the start. I have also seen patients come from providers who were not using the “optimal” ranges for lab values in Dr. Bredesen’s book. I don’t think we have the luxury of relaxing these ranges, quite yet. Just my 2 cents’. I also worry about the use of weak supplements, doses that are too low, or herbal shortcuts. I fear that even if they work, these leave people vulnerable to setbacks. THE NEED TO USE FUNCTIONAL MEDICINE The dysfunctions we uncover are all related to each other. For example, the most significant cause of high blood glucose is inflammation. The most common source of inflammation is increased intestinal permeability (leaky gut). Patients with excessive intestinal permeability cannot efficiently detox heavy metals, and other toxins. Heavy metals of course cause high blood glucose, and inflammation. So the patients are running several sets of interlocking vicious cycles, and the work we do is to extricate them systematically from these situations. Thankfully, functional medicine offers guidance for this. None of these links are commonly recognized or addressed in conventional medicine. I don’t believe I could do this work without an excellent foundation in functional medicine. In addition to interlocking vicious cycles, patients are also on medications that lock in their dysfunctions. For example, many have heartburn and take proton pump inhibitors, which worsen the absorption of a number of nutrients. The first job is to heal the underlying cause of the heartburn. This has to happen as we replenish the most critical nutrients and reverse inflammation. Again, the functional medicine tools allow me to move forward. Before I studied functional medicine, I used to have patients on chronic proton pump inhibitors that simply could not get well. I did not know how to guide them to digestive wellness. MAKING AND KEEPING PEOPLE WELL We have to find alternatives to conventional medical treatment that work just as well if not better. For example, it won’t do to put patients on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), on acid blockers, on anti-anxiety medications, on medications for sleep, on statins (they worsen glucose regulation, harm mitochondria, and interfere with myelin synthesis), on antibiotics (unless there is a life-threatening situation), and more. But we can’t leave people untreated for any of the conditions for which these would normally be prescribed. Again, functional medicine comes to the rescue: these conditions have diet and lifestyle solutions. We have to keep patients safe while they are focusing on reversing their cognitive decline. Fractures, surgeries, illnesses, stressful life events, new mold or Lyme exposure, and ongoing environmental toxin exposures, all must be avoided if at all possible, or their impact must be reduced. It becomes necessary to discuss how to avoid household toxicants, how to avoid getting colds, how to better address a conflict with another person (all that is in the e-book), and more. At the same time, our interventions must be safe. Many patients need to start a ketogenic diet, because ketones are a better source of energy for the brain in decline. But the ketogenic diet clearly poses major challenges. Excessive weight loss, loss of enjoyment, friction with family and friends, and loss of social contact due to not being able to enjoy some of the previously enjoyed foods - all these can be harmful. We need to proceed efficiently, cautiously, quickly, be comprehensive, incredibly organized, forgiving, optimistic, strategic, and compassionate. I won’t lie, it is a challenging field! CONCLUSION I’m in awe, every day, of the dedication and sense of agency of my patients. I hope that everyone at least learns about this protocol so they can take immediate action when they suspect the start of cognitive decline. We should remove the stigma of impaired cognition, so we can address the topic with each other and support each other in making lifestyle changes. I believe this is what we all have to do to create the end of Alzheimer’s.
Since training with Dr. Dale Bredesen, and since the publication of his book, I have seen more than a dozen patients wanting to focus on cognition. It is not an easy program, but patients are feeling better in a variety of ways, and some are starting to feel cognitively sharper as well. It is a long program, and there are many aspects to look at - after fixing the nutrient deficiencies and the hormone imbalances, many people need more work on heavy metals, mold and chronic infections.
TWO PROGRAMS I am launching a group version to try to lower costs for people who are having fairly mild symptoms. There are two programs. PLEASE NOTE!!
FOR LOCAL RESIDENTS For California residents who live locally here in the San Francisco Bay Area, and are willing to drive to my office, I am offering a two-part program consisting of the following: 1. An initial day long class that will involve detailed discussion of the protocol, individual visits with me, individual cognitive testing using CNS Vital Signs, and ordering of lab testing appropriate for each person's situation. Access to high quality affordable supplements will be offered. 2. A second day about 2 months later, to go over the lab results as a group and explain what to do for each one, answer questions, and finish explaining details of the protocol. More supplements are often used at this stage. The cost of this program is $1200-1400 per participant, provided we can put together enough participants. I will ask patients to fill out questionnaires ahead of time, and I will spend 20 minutes with each person and give you requisitions for labwork and supplements at reduced prices, optimizing costs. FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT LOCAL For patients who live too far to attend a local course, I am offering an online course with monthly group video calls for 1 year. That will take people step-by-step through the entire Bredesen protocol. In this case, patients will have to use their local providers or other methods to get lab testing ordered, as I cannot order testing for patients who are out of state. Also, while this may help a person diagnose a problem, like leaky gut or mold illness, these diagnoses don't always resolve well with self-treatment and may require a local provider in addition to the online course. FOR PEOPLE WHO ALREADY HAVE A BREDESEN-TRAINED PROVIDER The online course may be helpful in supporting anyone who is already doing the Bredesen protocol with their local provider. I will go over this online program in more detail in a free video broadcast January 10 at 5 PM Pacific time. The link to this video is here. There will be no video playing in this spot until the date of the video, but then if you have missed that time you can watch the video at the same link anytime after January 10. The online course costs $500 per participant, assuming we can enroll enough participants. CONTACT US There is much interest, and we are starting small. Please leave your email address here to a newsletter list that will focus only on group programs to reverse/prevent cognitive decline. Today is the first day of a series of videos about preventing and reversing cognitive decline. The website is here:
http://event.awakeningfromalzheimers.com/ Today's episode was a start, briefly discussed the importance of reviewing a person's medications to make sure there isn't a combination that might worsen cognition, and the importance of optimizing blood sugar and sleep. I believe this is going to be worthwhile, and easy to watch. There are many episodes, and it will be an investment, but so far, it looks informative.  In November 2014, neurologist Dale Bredesen M.D., published the first article on reversing cognitive decline. Using a combination of approaches centered on lifestyle and supplements, 9 out of a total of 10 patients reversed their dementia, and 6 of them even went back to work (1). I was very excited when I read that article, especially because Dr. Bredesen’s approach fits so well within a functional medicine framework. I couldn’t wait to put it into practice and wrote a blog post about it (some-approaches-can-reverse-cognitive-decline.html). Since then, I have taken Dr. Bredesen’s 3-day training for health care providers who want to apply the Bredesen protocol (now called “ReCODE”, for “reversal of cognitive decline”). I have also been seeing several patients for a few months and noticing some encouraging early results. A few patients are just starting to receive results of blood tests that will help us focus our efforts at reversal. In August 2017, Dr. Bredesen published his book “The End of Alzheimer’s: The First Program to Prevent and Reverse Cognitive Decline.” The book promptly sold out on Amazon but should be in stock again in early September. It is also available as a Kindle version, which is what I got. Though I had already spent many hours studying this information and organizing it to make it usable, I still found the book highly valuable. I also read it with an eye to considering whether it might be possible for many people to implement ReCODE on their own. WHAT YOU NEED TO DO What is the ReCODE approach? Basically you put into place universally beneficial habits (sleep, exercise, diet, stress reduction), and add supplements, alongside repairing dysfunctional processes (digestion, hormone function, processing of toxins) to the point that a number of blood test values are “optimized.” The ranges used by conventional labs are not sufficient here – we are looking to reverse illness so everything has to be “optimized.” And then you add supplements and herbs which in sufficient doses are known to enhance cognitive function. As you will see, the devil is in the details, but if you understand cognitive decline, it’s obvious that this would be the way to go. “The End of Alzheimer’s” starts by reviewing the current beliefs about dementia – as summarized, for example, on the web page of the Alzheimer's Association – stating that basically, Alzheimer’s Disease is considered incurable and lacks effective medications to manage its symptoms. A search for “Bredesen” on the Association’s website turns up some references to grants from a decade ago, focusing on basic research rather than clinical research. I could not find the 2014 article mentioned above, and the subsequent clinical articles authored by Bredesen (2), (3). One chapter of Bredesen’s book focuses on how a dementia patient feels. I loved this analysis: until now, people were not able to report on how things felt while they were in the throes of this disease because they never regained enough clarity to make the comparison. There’s nothing more compelling, once you have recovered a function, than to look back and remember how things were when you had lost it. For example, “Eleanor” recounts:
WHAT NOT TO DO Another chapter outlines what most people do wrong that causes them to get ill, and much of it applies to Alzheimer’s, other dementias, and other conditions that involve inflammation (which is most other chronic conditions, from depression, to autoimmune disease, to joint and muscle pains and digestive issues). It's a funny chapter, and also poignant, because it describes the way we functional physicians go through life – seeing hidden dangers where there was previously routine: the morning mocha and danish pastry, tuna sandwiches, diet sodas, afternoon candy, pasta dinners, and mildewy basements. I have to admit, those were almost daily “exposures” for me for decades. Dr. Bredesen writes:
A theme throughout the book is the near universal negative reaction of respected neurologists and people’s primary care physicians. It seems hard to believe that medicine would be so rigid, but at the same time, that is not entirely a bad thing. It would be a problem if we adopted new treatments without giving them much thought or study. However, from the point of view of functional medicine, a ReCODE type approach is completely in keeping with what we normally do successfully in pursuit of reversing other illnesses. The skepticism toward ReCODE is the same as that regarding reversing type 2 diabetes, or hypertension, or arthritis. Most people’s primary care and specialist physicians are very critical and remain in disbelief. Strikingly, they do not reach out to us to investigate, as though they were not interested. But I believe instead that they simply don’t trust themselves to figure out if something is really working: they would rather wait for an official guideline. The problem with dementia, as with many of the other “incurable” illnesses patients face, is that patients don’t have years to wait, and may even have lost faith in a system swayed by big business interests.  THE SCIENCE BEHIND THE BOOK Part 2 of the book delves into the science that explains how dementia comes about, and thus how these problems can be tackled and reversed. The science is very well laid out, with useful metaphors – some of which I immediately adopted with my “cognitive decline” patients. I find that knowing how something works improves my motivation to implement a complicated program. Dr. Bredesen compares cognitive decline to the “roof with 36 holes:” it’s raining in your house because the roof has many defects – not just a few. If you fix just two or three, it will continue to rain in your house. Another way I understand it is the problem of “feed-forward cycles” – to interrupt a negative feedback loop, you just need to stop one event from happening. But in a system of interconnected feed-forward cycles, you have to stop most of the links. So ReCODE is very much the inevitable conclusion of Dr. Bredesen's years of basic research. The novelty here is not the belief that mercury, or mold, or B vitamin deficiencies, or lack of thyroid hormone, can cause dementia. These are well-established medical facts. The novelty is in demonstrating that even small alterations in these parameters (being in the “normal,” but not the “optimal” range) can add up and create devastating decline. Reductionist clinical experiments, where only a single parameter is changed, will often have negative results where a combination of changes would have succeeded. But that, again, is functional medicine, and Dr. Bredesen admits that he was influenced by his wife Aida, an integrative physician. It is Dr. Sid Baker’s old metaphor: if you’re sitting on three thumb tacks, removing one will not make you feel better. The argument from the conventional medicine side is that big enough studies will include enough patients who are lacking only one aspect to get picked up in the statistics. Unfortunately this is not how Alzheimer’s disease develops: you often need more than one impairment to develop it, and reversing it requires you fix them all – thus very few people get better when you address only one of their impairments. In the book, you will learn about three major types of Alzheimer’s disease, as well as type 1.5, which combines type 1 and type 2. These three types are the ones most easily reversed. Now you begin to have a framework for the tasks that lie ahead, but it will require first figuring out what type you have, and this means laboratory testing. NUTS AND BOLTS There is no reason your primary care provider cannot order all the laboratory tests suggested in the book and use Dr. Bredesen’s optimal ranges to pinpoint sources of problems. There is a skill set that comes with fixing some of these deficiencies, but it is certainly a good first step to identify them. Insurance sometimes pays for this, and flexible spending accounts may cover the supplements that help address some of the problems found. But your physician will likely not order and interpret lab tests simply based on a book, because as I mentioned earlier, they are most likely waiting for an official recommendation from the American Board of Internal Medicine, Board of Family Physicians, or equivalent neurology association. And the expert panels are not yet convinced. So, the question arises as to how realistic it is to think that many people would navigate this protocol on their own. It is a complex endeavor in the face of an emotionally charged situation. Nonetheless, some patients have done so, and I can’t think of any other way to bring about change than to empower patients to feel hopeful, and to pressure their physicians and insurance companies politely and persistently until more get on board. By combining several direct-to-consumer sources like 23andme and DirectLabs or RequestATest, one can make some headway, assuming hormone status is optimal. If hormone therapy is needed, a physician's prescription for thyroid hormone, for estrogens, for progesterone, and/or testosterone will be required, and any physician would first have to be convinced that they are needed and safe. The services of a Bredesen-trained health care provider can be expensive, so I would love to see a calculation of how much money patients save when we use tricks we know for less expensive lab tests, specific supplements. We also use our experience and expertise to avoid going down wrong paths. If anyone has already calculated the cost of getting these labs without a physician, please leave a comment. I used a random few labs to get a quick sense: TEST IN MY PRACTICE IF PATIENT ORDERS total T3 $0-4 Direct Labs: $49 free and total testosterone $0-15 Direct Labs $79 Hemoglobin A1C $0-4 Direct Labs $119 Homocysteine $0-4 Direct Labs $69 ApoE4 genetic test $1-50 $199 for 23andme I believe you will spend a lot more ordering labs on your own than through a savvy functional medicine provider, perhaps in the order of $2000 more. Also, you will not be able to get all of them: I could not find the innate immune labs required for a diagnosis of mold impact on Direct Labs. I imagine that Dr. Bredesen could not write a book where he tells people to go see a functional medicine physician (though he does provide a link in Addendum A). And the truth is I am hopelessly biased, as seeing individual patients is in fact how I make my living. But do take a look for yourself, and make your own decision. Some of the tests mentioned do require a physician who knows enough integrative medicine to know of (and believe in) testing using Cyrex Labs, interpret integrative stool testing, prescribe the chelator for the urine heavy metal testing, etc. You may need a provider who knows how to take patients off proton pump inhibitors, how to control blood sugar and reverse prediabetes, how to use a low carb/high fat diet safely, treat for mold illness (CIRS – chronic inflammatory response syndrome), Lyme disease and co-infections, and mercury overload. Those of us who practice functional medicine have had to learn each of the above since our graduation from medical school, as well as keep up with advances as would be required of any physician. The 25 annual hours that are mandated in order to keep our licenses fall far short — this is why we can’t accept insurance rates of reimbursement that are based on a model where a physician sees 20 patients a day. HOW TO PROCEED I believe that any hope of making ReCODE more affordable might lie in setting up group visits. Especially at first, it could be much more cost-effective to go through the evaluation and intervention with a group of patients and their caregivers. This will require that enough patients reach out to us to start setting up these groups. Some of my colleagues dream of a ReCODE “center,” where patients could go and attend a series of classes, be seen by physicians in a cost-efficient manner, and quickly be on their way to improving cognition. “The End of Alzheimer’s” goes on to discuss the steps necessary to follow the protocol in great detail, and some common problems faced by those who have. In person, Dr. Bredesen is positive, encouraging, hopeful. He has witnessed miracles after a professional lifetime of seeing drug treatments fail. He has worked all his life to understand this disease, and the solution to the problem turns out to be a complicated one. As in other endeavors in life, it’s of little use to wish for what is not true to become true. Instead, we ought to “turn around and face in the direction the horse is going.”(4) This is one disease that cannot be solved by a single cutting edge pharmaceutical agent, not in 2017, but you don’t have to just decline and suffer. Commit to the ReCODE protocol for 6 months, and then decide if what you lose in implementing ReCODE is worth the bargain of saving your brain. ONLINE APPROACH I have put together a video outlining how I plan to structure an online course to take patients through a protocol to reverse/prevent cognitive decline structured on Dr. Bredesen's approach. REFERENCES (1) Aging 2014 Sep;6(9):707-17. Reversal of cognitive decline: a novel therapeutic program Bredesen DE (2) Aging 2016 Jun;8(6):1250-8 Reversal of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease. Bredesen DE, Amos EC, Canick J, Ackerley M, Raji C, Fiala M, Ahdidan J. (3) Aging 2016 Feb;8(2):304-13. Inhalational Alzheimer's disease: an unrecognized - and treatable - epidemic. Bredesen DE (4) The Five Things We Cannot Change, David Richo, 2006  A 2016 Frontline special was highly critical of the vitamin and supplement industry, pointing out that it is largely unregulated, that supplements are not proven to be useful, and that some people have become quite ill or even died due to a supplement they were using.
I actually agree with much of what they discussed on the show. The only thing I thought was a strange omission (given the topic) is that they never mentioned that we do have some independent third party testing for supplements, through ConsumerLab and LabDoor. Frontline also downplayed the known benefits of vitamins and herbs. For example, they never mentioned that in a 2012 research paper, 14,641 male physicians were randomized to receive a multivitamin or placebo, and followed over 10+ years. The group that took the vitamin had an 8% reduction in cancer. So vitamins may be poorly regulated but they are worth looking into. Moreover, contrary to Dr. Offit's assertion that most of us are getting enough vitamins, the US Department of Agriculture freely admits that most Americansdo not consume sufficient quantities of many vitamins. Right at the top of the list, only 46% of Americans consume enough vitamin A. 13% consume enough vitamin E. So, do you need to take vitamin supplements? How will you figure this out? CLARITY IS POSSIBLE I would like to help bring some clarity to the situation. That would take writing a book of course, but here are a few thoughts. I come at this from a very strict conventional medicine background. I practiced as a conventional family physician for 20 years (1987-2008) and during that time did not use or recommend any preventative vitamins. When I “discovered” functional medicine, I decided to suspend disbelief and try the supplements recommended by Dr. Mark Hyman in The Ultramind Solution. I was really amazed to feel that they were helping me (that was not a scientific observation, but an intuitive one). I then joined a group of physicians who were all to some extent transitioning from conventional to functional medicine, and we formed a “lab group” so we could share our experiences with the myriad of new and unusual tests that we saw being used by alternative medical providers. Which ones were reliable? We really wanted to know. Having followed a flawed recipe for health during our time in conventional medicine, we were quite determined to figure out how to provide the best care for our patients. WHAT ARE ALL THESE PILLS OUT THERE FOR? I see five basic types of pills sold without a prescription:
RELIABLE TESTS First there are some substances for which there are reliable tests. These include coenzyme Q10, vitamin D, vitamin B12 (though you need to check a methylmalonic acid, the B12 level is not sufficient) and other B vitamins (measured indirectly using the serum homocysteine – not perfect, but if too high, you know you need them – usually). The reason to test and treat for these is that insufficiency either causes fatigue and difficulties with the immune system, or may cause a number of problems in the future. The most important issue is prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease. This is such a long latency disease that our main focus is prevention (though it can sometimes be reversed with a functional medicine approach). Proper vitamin levels may not be sufficient for prevention, but they provide some insurance. There’s a few more nutrients I can test for reliably, including zinc, iron, selenium, and essential fatty acids, including long-chain fatty acids (omega 3s, omega 6s, arachidonic acid, etc.) and short chain fatty acids (made by beneficial bacteria). Cholesterol is another nutrient we can measure. LDL cholesterol, often called “bad cholesterol”, is actually the building block for many critical structures: cell walls, myelin sheath for nerve cells, and steroid hormones like estrogen, testosterone, progesterone, cortisol, vitamin D and thyroid hormone. So how “bad” can it be? Well, there are many sizes of LDL, and it can be in a normal state, or an oxidized or glycated state, and each of these sizes and states matter to cardiovascular health. We can measure all these, and it’s not expensive, but it is often not done. LESS RELIABLE TESTS There are nutrients one can only hope to get a good handle on: these include vitamins A, C, E, and magnesium. It seems you can best measure these indirectly, by looking at levels of certain metabolite levels (body substances), or at damaged cell structures, like lipid peroxides and the level of 8-OH-deoxyguanosine, a cancer predictor. UNRELIABLE TESTS Finally there are nutrients that we really can’t measure. For example, there are many tests for iodine but none are reliable indicators of deficiency or sufficiency. I used to like the serum iodine but now I am not sure it’s the best way to go. Experts in the supplementation field recommend a careful trial of iodine rather than testing. Many tests attempt to quantify beneficial bacteria and I am not sure we are really getting a good picture from them. The situation is so complex, some won’t grow in culture, and the techniques for detecting them are imperfect. In research, arrays of beneficial bacteria seem to have a tantalizing story to tell but in individual patients, I can only make out very broad generalities. I actually like to look at their output (the short chain fatty acids they synthesize) better than their presence or absence. Calcium levels are available but they tell us more about abnormal hormonal conditions or dangerous cancer side effects than about dietary calcium sufficiency. Whether calcium sticks to bone or not seems to depend more on just about everything else: fruits and vegetables in the diet, level and type of exercise, gluten sensitivity, etc. Calcium is also important for cardiovascular health, and it is true that if you consume no dairy and few vegetables, you are likely to be deficient. GAMING THE SYSTEM I use just a few herbs because to me they are in the same general way of thinking as medications. They may be better suited to our body than manufactured chemicals, They may sometimes accomplish what medications can’t. But in general, they are not a root-cause solution. I use some herbs that help reduce the impact of stress while someone is recovering from a long series of stressful events that have impacted the functioning of the adrenal glands. But along with these, I use stress reduction practices and tools to change how we respond to what bothers us. I use turmeric or a combination of anti-inflammatory herbs to try to get someone off anti-inflammatory medications which can cause intestinal permeability (and a vicious circle of inflammation). I’m sure some people need to stay on turmeric, in certain situations where damage will not completely resolve. I use red yeast rice when the harmful type of LDL cholesterol won’t resolve in spite of reasonable efforts with a functional medicine approach. There are many natural substances one can use to alleviate symptoms while we attempt to heal the underlying systems: inositol, N-acetyl cysteine, acetyl-l-carnitine, alpha lipoic acid, and many, many more. So many in fact that this is a significant problem with the first phase of functional medicine treatment: having to take so many pills. The goal is to get to a final minimum, or even to stop taking them altogether. VITAMINS FOR HEALTHY PEOPLE If you have no symptoms, no fatigue, no digestive issues, no joint pains (my three favorite symptoms to reverse!), no autoimmune disease, no strange neurological sensations, no mood or mind issues – should you still take a preventive vitamin? There are two things you can do to answer this question:
DO VITAMINS/SUPPLEMENTS CONTAIN WHAT THEY CLAIM? Here’s one last problem, in fact they sometimes don’t contain what they claim to contain. If you see a functional medicine provider, she will in fact tell you her favorite brands. Ask how she knows: does she read ConsumerLab or LabDoor? These are third party testing organizations that try to find out what is in vitamins and supplements, and whether they may be contaminated with lead (which can be a problem for herbs, for example). If you are on your own, you may have to get a subscription to ConsumerLab just long enough to figure out a specific set of vitamins and supplements. MY FAVORITES Well, my favorite types (because my favorite may depend on the condition):
CONCLUSION Why would Frontline present a documentary with such frightening headlines? Will supplements make you sick? If you avoid performance enhancers and get advice from a provider you trust, or use the resources that exist for assessing the adequacy and safety of vitamins and supplements, you would likely come out ahead. It’s not dangerous, but it does take some work to figure out. On the other hand, I hate to say it, but pharmaceutical companies have been trying to get the supplement industry regulated so they can take over. One problem they face is that the medications they promote themselves have very high rates of adverse effects: in 2009, the Drug Abuse Warning Network calculated that 50% of nearly 4.6 million drug-related emergency room visits were attributed to adverse reactions to medications taken as prescribed!! Dr. Paul Offit (interviewed on the Frontline documentary) is well aware of this, as his own Rotavirus vaccine is known to cause a very dangerous condition called "intussusception." But he is essentially employed by a pharmaceutical company that funds the “chair” he sits in and the Institute he created, and perhaps prefers to talk about the side effects of vitamins rather than the side effects of pharmaceuticals. We need to be careful what regulations are put in place, or only well-funded Big Pharma will be able to sell vitamins. The problem is that some of these pharmaceutical companies have a long history of hiding research findings and promoting their products without following regulations. So, yes, we need to fix the system we have, but let's be smart about it. REFERENCE Gaziano J, Sesso HD, Christen WG, et al. Multivitamins in the Prevention of Cancer in Men: The Physicians' Health Study II Randomized Controlled Trial. JAMA. 2012;308(18):1871-1880. AND OTHER REASONS TO BUY ORGANIC
Should you eat organic? Should you choose organic meat, or fruits and vegetables? Are the “clean fifteen” OK to buy “non-organic”? It’s hard to answer these questions without a point of reference. What are your goals? How did you come to adopt these goals? What are the underlying questions? We have grown used to inexpensive food (compared to other nations) to the point that our household budgets are dependent on it. However, there are many reasons to make a change, and not only for the most heavily contaminated “dirty dozen” crops. Here are some of the reasons to prioritize organic food: 1. Organic food is better for your health. We finally have a study that followed 35,000 Danish women through pregnancy. Women who ate mostly organic foods had half the chance that their baby boys would be born with a birth defect called hypospadias. This defect involves the development of male reproductive organs, which are sensitive to the hormone disrupting effect of many pesticides. 2. Organic food is the moral thing to do: we have solid research indicating that children of farmworkers, and children in farm areas, are affected by the pesticides we use on our food. If there were less such food, these impacts would be lessened. Our choices affect others’ lives. 3. Healthier farm children translate into lower health bills for our nation, and improved school scores, and hopefully an improved workforce. ADHD, for example, can lead to increased rates of low school achievement, drug use, truancy, and arrests. We should all care about outcomes for farm children. 4. Pesticides are affecting our environment: actually, few disagree on this point. Do we think that the destruction of our environment will never impact our own health and happiness? Of course it does. We are part of this ecosystem. For example, if bees become extinct, our food supply will be threatened. We should boycott all products raised with the use of neonicotinoid pesticides. Now. The world needs bees, we can’t afford to wait for scientists and businessmen to agree. 5. The old saying that “the dose makes the poison” is now believed to be false in many cases. You shouldn’t believe anything you read that relies on this argument. Unfortunately, many chemicals that affect our hormones work more powerfully in small doses than large. How can this be? Simple. These chemicals interact with receptors in our bodies. The receptors adjust to the level of chemical in the environment. If there is a low level, they accept the chemical and become affected by it. If there is a high level, they inactivate and stop becoming affected. Many chemicals were initially tested at high doses because we were looking for cancer-causing potential. Once they were found to be hormone mimics, the rules changed. They must be shown safe all over again, and many simply haven’t been tested. 6. Our regulatory agencies never thought that the effects of chemicals would pile up on top of one another. They somehow thought that if each chemical is at a safe level, then the food is safe to consume. But the truth is that the effects of chemicals add up on top of one another, even if they act on different biochemical pathways. It seems prudent to avoid chemicals where we can, even if their individual levels are deemed safe. 7. I sometimes see journalists make the argument that vegetables already contain toxins, which occur naturally to deter predators, and therefore we don’t need to be worried about small amounts of man-made pesticides. But I don’t understand: if plants, which we must eat to get our vitamins and phytonutrients, already contain toxins, then why add to the toxins they contain by eating vegetables with pesticides? IS THERE A SAFE AMOUNT? The basic question is whether there exists an amount of poison that is the minimum amount to cause any effect at all. Is there a threshold below which it doesn’t matter in any way that you swallowed a bit of poison? As described above, levels of chemicals are additive (and sometimes worse than additive), and thus we really have no idea of the final effect of the mixtures we may be exposed to. It also depends on the effect you are considering. If you worry about acute poisoning, meaning death within the week, there is definitely an amount that is safe. If you worry about getting leukemia and dying, there is an amount but it’s much lower. For example, mothers who use pesticides in their home up to a year before the birth of a child have children with a measurably higher risk of getting leukemia. If you are trying to measure subtle changes in personality, or in intelligence, or behavior, then there often is an even lower limit of acceptable toxin. Over time, we have lowered the allowable limits of lead for example, because of being better able to measure the brain damage caused by small amounts of lead. First we used IQ, later we used reading scores. You may say, what is the importance of this subtle behavior change? I may never notice the difference even with my kids. That may be true, but from the point of view of the country as a whole, if all the kids are a little more hyperactive, then thousands more kids will be actually “diagnosed” with ADHD, and thus many more will be taking medication and requiring follow up. It’s as though there were thousands of children on the cusp of being considered hyperactive, and this extra small amount of pesticide pushed them over the edge and into a “diagnosable” category. The same happens with developmental delay, or autism, or anxiety and depression. Many illnesses are a matter of degree. BETTER DEFENSE There is yet another concern. Some children have slower defenses than other kids when it comes to getting rid of these chemicals. A standard dose accumulates and will lead to symptoms they may never have had if they were a faster “detoxifier”. Doctors don’t test detoxifying capacity or efficiency. There is no way to know except after the fact, when neurological damage has occurred. In one recent case (the case of Heather Poling), the courts ruled that a young girl acquired autistic behaviors due to a vaccine she received, because she had a genetic defect that left her vulnerable to this. We wish we had ways to detect all such children ahead of time, but we don’t. We understand the pathways in only a small number of children. We see that many children with autism actually seem to regress like this girl, but we don’t understand the sequence of neurological events very well at all. So we can’t say what “caused” it, but chemicals known to be neurotoxins at a specific dose, while okay for most, may be very harmful for a few. There is no doubt that disabilities, specifically learning and behavior disabilities in children, are on the rise. The chance of having a child with autism is about 1 in 50 at this time. Autoimmune diseases, asthma, eczema, and allergies are also on the rise, including severe food allergies. Even for adults, neurological diseases are on the rise, such as Parkinson’s disease, which has a proven link to pesticide use. HOW DO WE DECIDE In the face of neurological damage rising nationwide, would you choose to give your kids neurotoxins, in any amount? In the face of increasing immunological abnormalities, would you choose to give them immune system toxins? What if you have one of the children with the genetically slow detoxification pathways? What is unfair in this country is that so few children have access to clean nutritious food, and that not all children are safe from harmful farm practices. Let’s right this! If all of us who can afford it insist on clean food, we will have more clean farms, and cheaper clean food. This will allow even more people to be able to afford clean, tasty, healthy food. This is how you correct an injustice. Our main agricultural outputs include corn, soy, and wheat. The first two are controlled by a single corporation that happens to be a pesticide manufacturer, and whose publicly expressed goal is the control of the entire food supply. Massive government subsidies flow to this type of agriculture. In turn, the largest corporations fund our universities and direct the public conversation on the need for artificial inputs in order to grow affordable food. Careful studies have shown, however, that we don’t need chemical agriculture. In fact, given climate change and yields under unpredictable weather conditions, small-scale organic agriculture is what we need to turn to in the decades to come. This is the time to transition to organic food as a nation: for our health and that of our kids’, and our neighbors and their kids’; for our environment and for our future as a species on this planet.  In November 2014, California researcher Dale Bredesen reported on a therapeutic program he used to successfully reverse cognitive decline (see link at bottom of article). He reported on 10 patients who were enrolled in this program. Six of his 10 patients had discontinued work due to memory issues, but after following his program, they were able to return to work. All patients but one improved on objective measurements, as well as subjectively. Several months after the publication of this article, there are now about 45 patients and the results continue to be encouraging. A research study with 200 patients is being launched by MUSES Lab.
This therapeutic program is based on a multifaceted approach. It contains the following components: o The patients’ diet was optimized by minimizing carbohydrates and inflammatory foods o A 12 hour fast was instituted each night o Stress was reduced using a personalized approach o Sleep was optimized, including treating sleep apnea where needed o Exercise was increased o Brain stimulation was added in the form of software such as Posit o Blood tests were used to optimize B and D vitamin sufficiency, and zinc to copper ratio o Vitamin E, selenium, NAC, alpha-lipoic acid, coQ10 were added o Anti-inflammatory herbs were used for patients with high levels of inflammation o Thyroid hormone was balanced o Gastrointestinal function was improved o Herbs and other substances that improve cognition were recommended o Building blocks for brain cell communication were provided (Citicoline, DHA, etc…) o Heavy metals were tested and reduced where appropriate This program is very exciting because there are no medications presently that are truly effective in preventing decline, let alone reversing it. It may seem strange that this hasn't made headlines: but what brand new medical therapy ever does? First, there is Step 1: a small group of patients are convinced to try a new approach. If this works well, then, in Step 2, more patients are enrolled. Eventually, we get to Step 3: the drug company funds a large trial costing millions of dollars, researchers tally and publish the findings and gradually, the treatment is adopted by medical providers. The process normally takes about 15-20 years. But here we are on Step 1. We have a group of patients who have met with resounding success. How do we get to Step 3: what deep pockets will fund this type of approach? The treatment is time-consuming and demanding, but it does NOT pose a health risk. I see no reason not to consider it. Most importantly, the program makes a lot of sense from a functional medicine perspective: we need to identify and correct all the underlying causes of inflammation, because inflammation disturbs mitochondria (energy transducers in your cells) and in turn that causes the brain to function very poorly. Then we need to use all the tools we have: we have research showing that exercise helps mitochondria a little bit; we know overnight fasting helps them a bit too; we know the supplements used in this program work a little bit; and we know a lot of people with Alzheimer's or Parkinson's or multiple sclerosis, or epilepsy, or depression and anxiety for that matter--benefit from the low-carb diet. What Dr. Bredesen's approach does that is new is that it combines a large number of these interventions. He explains it thus: "If you had a roof with 17 holes in it, would you want just a single one fixed? Would that be satisfactory? So we fix all 17 holes, that is why there are so many components to this program." I am very excited to put this to the test. I am sticking very close to Dr. Bredesen's successful recipe: first I do a functional medicine consultation, to uncover all the likely sources of inflammation and identify all the possible nutrient deficiencies. At baseline, we get brain function tests so we have a score to compare to in 3 months when we re-test. Then, step by step, week by week, we add one or two components as tolerated. The visits can be brief, and follow up can be as frequent as you like. Within 3 months, with any luck at all, your life will be transformed. If you wonder whether this is for you, you can use an online tool to see how your brain function compares to that of other people your age. You can take brain tests on Lumosity for example. If you want to read the article for yourself, here's the link: Bredesen, D.E. 2014. Reversal of Cognitive Decline: A Novel Therapeutic Approach. Aging 9(7): 707-717 |
Blog AuthorDr. Myrto Ashe MD, MPH is a functional medicine family physician. Archives
July 2023
Categories |
RSS Feed
